Pointing out that there is an “extremely high” risk of doping in India, the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) Board has downgraded the Indian athletics federation (AFI) from ‘Category B’ to ‘Category A’ under Rule 15 of the World Athletics’ Anti-Doping Rules. This comes in a year when India’s track and field athletes will be competing at Asian Games in Japan and the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow.
In July last year, when an Indian delegation had made their pitch to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) at the Olympic headquarters in Lausanne to bring home the 2036 Olympics, India’s track record on doping was one of the issues that was highlighted by the IOC, besides other issues like governance.
This re-classification of the Athletics Federation of India (AFI) means that India’s track and field athletes will now have to comply with more stringent anti-doping stipulations.
According to Rule 15 of the World Athletics’ Anti-Doping Rules, national federations are categorized as Category ‘A’, Category ‘B’ or Category ‘C’ member federations according to the relative doping risk they represent to the integrity of the sport of athletics at the international level. Rule 15 came into effect in 2019 and creates anti-doping obligations on national federations who can be held accountable for the anti-doping programmes operated in their country.
‘Category A’ member federations, which represent the highest risk, are subject to more stringent requirements under the Rules, including minimum testing requirements for their national team athletes.
“This is a good step. There will be more scrutiny. All in all it will clean up the system. In gathering intelligence, out of competition testing, testing at state and district level, more has to be done,” World Athletics vice-president and Athletics Federation of India spokesperson Adille Sumariwalla told The Indian Express on Monday.
He also added that criminalisation of doping will be a deterrent.
Story continues below this ad
“The government is also moving towards criminalising doping, which I have been asking for years. I was the one who originally initiated the first doping bill. Suspension and arrests of coaches, supplies and distributors should be done. There has to be a strong deterrent. A case in point being of the Indian athlete serving three years in Kenya for distributing forbidden substances. Education has been done, now it is time for regulation,” the World Athletics vice president said.
Why was India downgraded?
This decision, made public by the AIU by a press release on Monday, was taken by the Athletics Integrity Unit Board after India ranked in the top two for the most Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRVs) in athletics between 2022 and 2025.
In 2022, India recorded 48 ADRVs (ranked 2nd) while in 2023, the number grew to 63 (ranked 2nd); and then rose even further to 71 in 2024 (ranked 1st). For 2025, India has recorded 30 ADRVs so far, which puts it at rank 1st, but with a caveat that there is a substantial time lag in reporting the final ADRV numbers.
“The doping situation in India has been high-risk for a long time and, unfortunately, the quality of the domestic anti-doping programme is simply not proportionate to the doping risk,” AIU Chair David Howman said in a statement.
“While the AFI has advocated for anti-doping reforms within India, not enough has changed. The AIU will now work with the AFI to achieve reforms to safeguard the integrity of the sport of athletics, as we have done with other ‘Category A’ Member Federations.”
Story continues below this ad
What does this mean for India’s track and field athletes?
Here are just some of the measures that will be imposed on Indian athletes due to AFI being classified in Category A, according to Rule 15 of the World Athletics’ Anti-Doping Rules:
The national testing programme must ensure that all athletes who compete as part of a National Team in any World Athletics Series Event, Olympic Games or World Athletics Ultimate Championship, and who are not already on the International Registered Testing Pool, have been adequately tested in accordance with the requirements of this rule.
The testing program must also include in-competition testing, no notice out-of-competition testing and pre-competition blood testing for screening purposes (Athlete Biological Passport) and analyses as prescribed under WADA’s Technical Document on Sport-Specific Analyses (TDSSA).
If Athletes do not reside or train from time to time in the country of the federation, it remains the responsibility of Category ‘A’ federation (or the relevant anti-doping organisation) to ensure that the athletes are subject to testing abroad. The fact that an athlete resides from time to time or trains or competes abroad is not a valid reason not to test them and not to meet the requirements
Story continues below this ad
All test samples of athletes will have to be provided to be analysed by WADA-accredited (or WADA-approved) laboratories for full menu analysis.
