The peculiar boundary dimensions at the Edgbaston ground for the ongoing India vs England Test this week have sparked discussions about Ben Stokes’ home side leveraging conditions in their backyard to aid their ‘Bazball’ style of cricket against Shubman Gill’s men.
Ever since reports emerged that India were deliberating the thought of fielding two spinners, which they eventually did by picking Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar, Stokes and head coach Brendon McCullum have been in contact with the groundsmen to bring in the boundary ropes to the least permissible limit within the ICC’s playing conditions.
The ploy has been linked to negate the threat of the tweakers and apply more pressure on the fielders by targeting the shorter square boundaries.
The Times UK reported that it was confirmed by match officials that the boundary on no part of the ground was longer than 71 yards (64.9 metres) from the stumps, with England bringing in the ropes further than what it was in the recent matches against West Indies and Australia in the 2023 Ashes on the ground.
The straight boundaries were determined to be around 60 metres, nearly 30m short of the maximum allowed distance by the ICC’s playing conditions.
General view of play on Day 2 of the India vs England Test at Edgbaston. (AP)
What do the ICC rules suggest?
While England have indeed attempted to gain an advantage in reducing the effect spinners Jadeja and Sundar may have on the strip, they have not bent any officially laid down rules while at it.
“No boundary shall be longer than 90 yards [or] shorter than 65 yards from the centre of the pitch,” reads a statement in the ICC World Test Championship playing conditions. However, it is to be noted “the aim shall be to maximise the size of the playing area at each venue”.
Story continues below this ad
The rules also state that it is the home board’s discretion to determine the ranges of the boundary dimensions that will remain fixed throughout the match. “Before the match the umpires shall consult with the home board to determine the boundary of the field of play”.
Why are the boundaries at Edgbaston so short for this Test?@finnysteve has a Bazball-related explanation 🤔#ENGvIND #BBCCricket pic.twitter.com/IdMr2vN0ln
— Test Match Special (@bbctms) July 2, 2025
“There’s communication throughout … We give as much information as we can to suit what team we want to go for — and how we want to play our cricket as well,” Edgbaston groundsman Gary Barwell had told reporters when asked about the messages passed from the England camp.
How did the boundary dimensions affect India while batting?
While the overall make-up of the conditions and the flatbed pitch helped India put on 587 in 151 overs, India were dealt a minor blow when star batter Rishabh Pant’s miscalculation of the shortened boundaries ended with his dismissal off off-spinner Shoaib Bashir. After cracking one maximum, Pant attempted another swing over the distinctly smaller wide long-on boundary, but holed out to Zak Crawley, the celebrations of which suggested a plan had worked out to disrupt the batter’s instincts.
Pant holes out to Zak Crawley at long-on!
“Cheerio, cheerio, cheerio” shouts The Hollies 👋
🇮🇳 2️⃣0️⃣8️⃣-4️⃣ pic.twitter.com/qM8ZoX8ZwI
— England Cricket (@englandcricket) July 2, 2025
Have England employed shorter dimensions befoe?
Yes. More famously in the 2005 Ashes against Shane Warne and Co. and more recently against India in the 2019 World Cup. An in-form unit led by Virat Kohli were stopped in the group stages by England when they stubbed spinners Yuzvendra Chahal and Kuldeep Yadav for 160 runs in 20 overs in an eventual 31 runs. The Men in Blue were reportedly displeased by England’s tactic, forcing unusually short boundaries on one side of the square.
How have former England players reacted to the Edgbaston boundary dimensions?
Story continues below this ad
Former England all-rounder David Lloyd could not reason why the boundaries were brought in as much as they had this week at Edgbaston. “I was confused by how far in the boundary ropes were. I think it has something to do with having them not too close to the advertising boards,” Lloyd wrote in the Daily Mail.
However, former England pacer Steve Finn linked the ploy to Bazball and Stokes’ choice to chase down totals after winning the toss at home. “I stood right by the boundary rope, which is a considerable way in from where you may anticipate for a normal Test match,” he said on BBC. “England and their propensity to want to win the toss, bowl first and chase in the last innings maybe is the reason why those boundaries have come so far in.”
