3 min readUpdated: Mar 27, 2026 11:52 AM IST
A former government official who once captured national attention on Kaun Banega Crorepati (KBC) is now at the centre of a corruption case in Madhya Pradesh, with investigators alleging a multi-crore fraud in flood relief funds. Amita Singh Tomar, who won Rs 50 lakh on the show in 2019, was arrested from her Gwalior residence on March 26 and subsequently sent to a women’s jail in Shivpuri.
Tomar, who served as tehsildar in Vijaypur of Sheopur district, is accused of being part of a Rs 2-2.5 crore scam linked to the disbursal of compensation after the devastating 2021 floods. According to the investigation, authorities had identified 794 affected residents in Baroda tehsil as eligible beneficiaries. However, an audit later revealed that funds were allegedly diverted into at least 127 allegedly fake or unrelated bank accounts instead of reaching those impacted. Police claim that the diversion was not incidental but part of a wider pattern involving the manipulation of official records and beneficiary lists.
The case widened as investigators named over 100 individuals, including more than two dozen patwaris, with allegations of collusion across levels of the revenue administration. Crucially, investigators have pointed to financial transactions allegedly linked to accounts of Tomar’s family members. Based on these findings, Baroda police registered offences under cheating, forgery, criminal conspiracy and provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, citing misuse of official position in the distribution of state aid.
Sheopur Superintendent of Police Sudhir Kumar Aggarwal confirmed the arrest and said, “The tehsildar was made the accused in this case and was arrested and produced before the local court. The investigation in the case is underway.”
Tomar’s anticipatory bail plea was rejected first by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, effectively clearing the way for her arrest. Administrative action followed swiftly, with Sheopur Collector Arpit Verma removing her from her post just a day before police moved in.
Court documents note that the prosecution alleges Tomar was instrumental in approving documentation that enabled the diversion of funds meant for flood victims. At the same time, her defence argued that she had been falsely implicated and that her role was largely procedural. Her legal team maintained that beneficiary lists and bank details were prepared by patwaris and verified by revenue inspectors and naib tehsildars, after which the files were placed before her for signature and forwarding.
The defence further submitted that Tomar neither handled financial transactions nor received any direct monetary benefit, and that her name did not initially appear in the FIR. It also pointed out that several co-accused, including patwaris allegedly involved in preparing records, had already been granted bail.
