Accepting keyword ‘accumulation’ over ‘aggression’ may have come in the way of a series win for Shubman Gill’s India on their recent England sojourn. But if one takes into account the backdrop of a 0-3 home whitewash against New Zealand and the batting shambles witnessed in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy series in Australia, the 2-2 stalemate may pass off as a win.
A win on the ‘execution’ front for India’s batting main cast manning the red-ball transition. A morale-booster for head coach Gautam Gambhir and a riposte to Bazball cultists. The result at Lord’s will sting, but the Indian team management and the new batting order will take pride in ticking off fresh boxes, recalibrated post the 1-3 debacle in Australia.
The visitors weren’t always equipped to take 20 wickets on the UK tour, but the radical batting overhaul is a worthy uptick that Gill & Co will hope to build on before their next SENA trip in October 2026.
The cornerstone for change was firmly placed on a base distinct from that of the Englishmen, not necessarily keen on emulating their rapid scoring bursts. England recorded 3,378 runs in nine innings in the series, their 4.17 run rate the third-highest ever in a five-match Test series.
Trading run rate for sheer volume, India piled on 3,809 – the most runs ever in a five-match series – at a higher average (42.32). Striking the right balance between the several gears of five-day batting, India’s 3.62 run rate in the series ranks as their best-ever in a series featuring at least five Tests.
| India Batting | Inns | Runs | Balls | Wkts | Control% |
| in England 2025 | 10 | 3809 | 6313 | 88 | 84.10% |
| In Australia 2024/25 | 10 | 2126 | 3942 | 85 | 80.00% |
Middling to perfection
A cursory review of the series reflects the flip in the script. India’s three 500-plus run-scorers – Shubman Gill, KL Rahul and Ravindra Jadeja – exuded effortless ‘control’ for the majority of the series, admittedly on pitches prepared to wear down seam-bowling packs.
The comparison of India’s batting in Australia and England reveals telling enhancements. India batted 2,371 deliveries more in England than Down Under in equal innings (10), propelling the 4.1 percent gain in control percentages (80% to 84.1%) as a monumental marker of consistent quality batting in the UK.
Story continues below this ad
Channelling the old-school instincts naturally benefited batters of the ilk of Rahul and Jadeja, run-accumulators in whites. The effects also rubbed off on Gill and Rishabh Pant; their sharpened ‘timing’ produced stronger results when juxtaposed against their returns on previous tours.
Firming up control, formally measured as the number of balls middled, ensured that Gill, Pant, Rahul and Jadeja played key roles in the batting revival. The skipper marked the prominent surge, translating time in the middle into better results when pressing on the attack.
| India when attacking pace | ||||||
| Inns | Runs | Balls | Avg | Balls/dismissal | Ctrl% | |
| In Australia | 10 | 1001 | 551 | 30.3 | 17.2 | 78.2 |
| In England | 10 | 1634 | 1023 | 60.5 | 37.9 | 82.8 |
According to Cricket-21 data, Gill was dismissed three times in only 32 deliveries (44 runs) against seamers while attacking in Australia, with false shots creeping up to 28 percent. Attacking 215 balls off pacers of the 1,150 deliveries he faced in England, Gill reduced his false shots to only 10.2 percent.
The staggering gain in control meant only two dismissals to pace while recording 338 runs from deliveries he chose to attack.
Story continues below this ad
Pant left a similar imprint in England. Of the 89 attacking shots played, Pant made contact with the sweet spot of his bat on 76 occasions.
Collectively, the Indian batting average on attacking shots against pace doubled from 30.3 to 60.5 between the two series, scoring 633 more runs with six fewer wickets lost in England.
The new batting template eased the burden on Rahul and Jadeja, with both batters securing 500-plus run tallies for the first time in their long careers.
The 2-2 scoreline may be a result of lack of assertiveness on the bowling front. But the approach of putting a price on their wicket on English soil may bind this Indian line-up together before spicier challenges ahead.
