BYU
• Fr
• 6’9″
/ 215 lbs
Projected Team
Washington
|
PROSPECT RNK
1st
|
POSITION RNK
1st
|
PPG
25.5
|
RPG
6.8
|
APG
3.7
|
3P%
33.1%
|
Partly because he had an incredible freshman year, partly because Peterson did not, Dybantsa, again, has emerged as the favorite in the betting markets to be selected first next month. He’s a jumbo-wing and natural scorer who led the EYBL in points per game after his freshman season of high school and the entire nation in points per game during his freshman season at BYU. Based on that trajectory, and Dybantsa’s awesome physical tools, it should surprise nobody if he also someday leads the NBA in scoring, and suddenly the Wizards have a chance to be interesting next season with Dybantsa in a starting lineup alongside Trae Young and Anthony Davis.
|
Kansas
• Fr
• 6’6″
/ 205 lbs
Projected Team
Utah
|
PROSPECT RNK
2nd
|
POSITION RNK
1st
|
PPG
20.2
|
RPG
4.2
|
APG
1.6
|
3P%
38.2%
|
Peterson’s talent is undeniable but there are questions among some front offices about his ability to maximize his gifts because of the way his one season at Kansas unfolded. He was special in spots, clearly. But Peterson was also in and out of the lineup a lot — sometimes by his own choice — and that fact has raised concerns in some corners that the electric playmaker will need to alleviate in the pre-draft process to ensure he remains an option at No. 1 and solidifies a spot in the top two. Either way, Utah’s rebuild should officially be over with a core of Peterson, Lauri Markkanen and Jaren Jackson Jr.
|
North Carolina
• Fr
• 6’10”
/ 215 lbs
Projected Team
Memphis
|
PROSPECT RNK
4th
|
POSITION RNK
2nd
|
PPG
19.8
|
RPG
9.4
|
APG
2.7
|
3P%
25.9%
|
The Grizzlies advanced three spots from where they were slotted, making the tough “moving forward” portion of the season that fans endured more than worth it. Needless to say, Cameron Boozier is an option here — and he very well could be the pick. But after dealing Desmond Bane and Jaren Jackson Jr., and with Ja Morant also expected to be moved, Memphis needs a star, and I simply believe Wilson is the best swing-for-a-star option after Dybantsa and Peterson are off of the board.
|
Duke
• Fr
• 6’9″
/ 250 lbs
Projected Team
Chicago
|
PROSPECT RNK
3rd
|
POSITION RNK
1st
|
PPG
22.5
|
RPG
10.2
|
APG
4.1
|
3P%
39.1%
|
Boozer has low bust-potential, I think, given how he’s never not been awesome in a way that impacts winning at every level at which he’s played. He was the national high school player of the year in 2026, then the national college player of the year in 2026. There are no shortage of accolades connected to Boozer. That said, some do worry that his star-potential is also low in part because he’s mostly a below-the-rim forward who can struggle with the type of size and athleticism he’ll consistently face in the NBA. As always, we’ll see. But if Boozer does fall to this spot, the Bulls could snatch him up and make him the face of their rebuild in the post Billy Donovan era.
|
Arkansas
• Fr
• 6’3″
/ 190 lbs
PPG
23.5
|
RPG
3.1
|
APG
6.4
|
3P%
44%
|
Acuff just became the first player to lead the SEC in both points and assists since Pete Maravich did it at LSU in 1970. Special talent. Fun player. Do I wish he were taller? Yes. Do I wish he weren’t a negative-defender? Also yes. But the offensive skill-set and deadly jumper are too much to pass on at this point in this draft, and that’s why I expect Acuff to become the 12th player in history to become a top-five pick after a season with John Calipari, making him the prize of the Clippers’ decision to trade Ivica Zubac to the Pacers at the deadline.
|
Illinois
• Fr
• 6’6″
/ 185 lbs
Projected Team
Brooklyn
|
PROSPECT RNK
7th
|
POSITION RNK
4th
|
PPG
17.9
|
RPG
5.1
|
APG
4.2
|
3P%
39.7%
|
Any franchise that’s averaged just 26 wins over the past three seasons needs to focus on the best prospect available — and, at this point in this mock, that’s Wagler. The big lead-guard went from a sub-100 prospect in the Class of 2025 to a definite top-10 pick in the 2026 NBA Draft, all in less than a year, thanks to his great positional size, ability to process things and reliable perimeter jumper. Wagler is very different than Acuff, and they could come off the board in any order, meaning the Nets might just take whichever one drops to them, assuming at least one of them will and does.
|
Houston
• Fr
• 6’4″
/ 190 lbs
Projected Team
Sacramento
|
PROSPECT RNK
6th
|
POSITION RNK
3rd
|
PPG
16.1
|
RPG
4.1
|
APG
5.2
|
3P%
38.7%
|
The Kings were unlucky on lottery day, dropping two spots from their slot in a way that will make landing the star the franchise needs harder to obtain. Still, there are potential stars available at No. 7, and Flemings is among them. The point guard prospect wasn’t the highest-rated recruit in Houston’s freshman class — but he emerged as the program’s best player while helping the Cougars win 30 games and advance to the Sweet 16 of the NCAA Tournament. He’s the rare 19 year-old who is both a top-tier athlete and strong shooter. If Sacramento ever turns things around, Flemings could be the face of it.
|
Louisville
• Fr
• 6’5″
/ 190 lbs
Projected Team
Atlanta
|
PROSPECT RNK
8th
|
POSITION RNK
5th
|
PPG
18.2
|
RPG
3.3
|
APG
4.7
|
3P%
34.4%
|
This is where the draft breaks, at least in my mind, but perhaps only because Brown played just 21 games in his one season at Louisville. His back was an issue over the past year. Will it be moving forward? That’s for the doctors to determine. But, if not, Brown is a top-five-ish talent available outside of the top five, and he could join a roster in Atlanta that should be positioned to compete for a top-six seed in the Eastern Conference for the second straight season.
|
Arizona
• Fr
• 6’4″
/ 205 lbs
Projected Team
Dallas
|
PROSPECT RNK
10th
|
POSITION RNK
1st
|
PPG
16.1
|
RPG
4.9
|
APG
2.4
|
3P%
39.1%
|
Koa Peat was the talk of Arizona’s freshman class early — especially after he got 30 points in that season-opening win over Florida. But it was Burries, also a first-year player, who emerged as the leading scorer for a team that won the Big 12’s regular-season title and advanced to the Final Four of the NCAA Tournament. He’s a physical guard who can shoot and rebound. He’d fit nicely in Dallas next to franchise centerpiece Cooper Flagg.
|
Tennessee
• Fr
• 6’10”
/ 207 lbs
Projected Team
Milwaukee
|
PROSPECT RNK
9th
|
POSITION RNK
3rd
|
PPG
16.7
|
RPG
6.3
|
APG
2.3
|
3P%
33.3%
|
Ament had an up-and-down freshman season for the Vols — but the upside isn’t hard to spot. Less than a year ago, the 2025 McDonald’s All-American was considered a possible top-five pick. So getting Ament here would be nice for a Bucks franchise that seems on the verge of rebuilding after presumably tradiing Giannis Antetokounmpo this offseason.
|
Michigan
• Sr
• 6’9″
/ 235 lbs
Projected Team
Golden St.
|
PROSPECT RNK
12th
|
POSITION RNK
5th
|
PPG
15.1
|
RPG
6.8
|
APG
3.2
|
3P%
37.2%
|
Lendeborg transferred from UAB to Michigan and was the best player on a team that won the NCAA Tournament one year after he didn’t even win Player of the Year honors in the sport’s 11th-best conference (American). Just an awesome story. That he’s already 23 years old will turn some franchises off — but if Golden State is still all-in on trying to put pieces around Steph Curry, Lendeborg’s age should mostly be irrelevant to the decision-making process.
|
Michigan
• Jr
• 7’3″
/ 255 lbs
PPG
12.1
|
RPG
6.8
|
APG
2.4
|
3P%
30%
|
Mara transferred to Michigan after two years at UCLA and was among the biggest reasons the Wolverines won the Big Ten regular-season title outright and then also the national championship. At a time when being big is back in style in the NBA, Mara has great positional size and is constantly altering shots on defense. On offense, he’s a high-end passer and efficient scorer. With Isaiah Hartenstein’s future unclear in OKC, Mara could be an inexpensive replacement if the Thunder don’t want to exercise the $28.5 million team-option on their starting center.
|
Alabama
• Fr
• 6’3″
/ 175 lbs
Projected Team
Miami
|
PROSPECT RNK
15th
|
POSITION RNK
6th
|
PPG
22
|
RPG
3.5
|
APG
5
|
3P%
39.9%
|
Not every prospect who returns to college actually enhances his draft stock — but Philon definitely did. The sophomore guard played more on-the-ball for Alabama than he did in the previous season, and the result was better assist numbers and a 3-point percentage that jumped to 39.9. The unusual amount of top-shelf lead guards available this year will push Philon down further than he’d go in most drafts, but that just makes him a value-pick at this point for the Heat.
|
Michigan
• Soph
• 6’9″
/ 250 lbs
Projected Team
Charlotte
|
PROSPECT RNK
21st
|
POSITION RNK
3rd
|
PPG
13.1
|
RPG
7.3
|
APG
1.2
|
3P%
34.3%
|
Johnson has left the door open to return to Michigan but is expected to remain in the draft as an assumed lottery pick. He’s one of three projected top-15 prospects who helped the Wolverines win the NCAA Tournament. The 6-9 forward shot above 60% from the field as one of the Big Ten’s best players — but his real value is on the other end, where Johnson anchored college basketball’s best defense in his first year at Michigan after transferring from Illinois.
|
Washington
• Fr
• 6’11”
/ 229 lbs
Projected Team
Chicago
|
PROSPECT RNK
17th
|
POSITION RNK
7th
|
PPG
18.5
|
RPG
11.8
|
APG
1.6
|
3P%
34%
|
You might’ve noticed this mock is light on prospects currently playing overseas, and that’s because lots of the top international names have been lured stateside via big NIL/revenue-share payments. Steinbach was one such player. The 20-year-old German proved to be an elite rebounder on both ends in his one season at Washington. The Bulls need help everywhere in an aknowledged rebuild. Getting Boozer and Steinbach in the top 15 could expedite the process.
|
Texas Tech
• Soph
• 6’3″
/ 178 lbs
Projected Team
Memphis
|
PROSPECT RNK
22nd
|
POSITION RNK
8th
|
PPG
18.5
|
RPG
3.6
|
APG
7.4
|
3P%
41.5%
|
Anderson went from an intriguing freshman at Texas Tech to one of the Big 12’s stars and best prospects. The sophomore from Atlanta kept the Red Raiders relevant even after JT Toppin, the reigning Big 12 Player of the Year, went down with a torn ACL in February. Anderson has been described as the best shooter in this class after making 41.5% of the 7.9 3-pointers he attempted this season. In theory, he could offset some of the shooting Memphis sent to Orlando when it traded Desmond Bane last summer.
|
Karim Lopez
PF
Mexico
• 6’8″
/ 224 lbs
PPG
11.9
|
RPG
6.1
|
APG
1.9
|
3P%
32.2%
|
Lopez should be the first non-college player off the board. (Sidenote: the idea that the first non-college player off the board could go in the late teens speaks to the level of talent NIL is luring and keeping in college.) He’s a physical wing from Mexico with lots of positives. If the 3-point shot comes around, and as long as he doesn’t prove to be a liability on defense, Lopez would be a terrific snag here for an Oklahoma City franchise just stockpiling talent.
|
Baylor
• Soph
• 6’5″
/ 190 lbs
Projected Team
Charlotte
|
PROSPECT RNK
20th
|
POSITION RNK
2nd
|
PPG
18.9
|
RPG
5.8
|
APG
2.6
|
3P%
37.4%
|
Carr emerged as a real first-round option after transferring from Tennessee to Baylor and having one of the biggest breakout years in the sport while averaging 14.1 more points per game with the Bears than he averaged previously with the Vols. The 21 year-old has long arms and a solid-enough jumpshot to where it’s not hard to imagine him, even as a rookie, helping Charlotte make the Eastern Conference Playoffs once again next season.
|
Kentucky
• Soph
• 6’10”
/ 255 lbs
Projected Team
Toronto
|
PROSPECT RNK
13th
|
POSITION RNK
1st
|
PPG
5
|
RPG
5
|
APG
0.5
|
3P%
0
|
Mark Pope might be less on the hot seat at Kentucky heading into next season if Quaintance had been available more this season. He cost a lot of money and did little while rehabbing a torn ACL that limited him to just four appearances. Regardless, I saw Quaintance up close at the CBS Sports Classic, and he made an obvious impact immediately in that game. Unless the medicals are scary, Quaintance should not fall much further than this — and he could go much higher.
|
Houston
• Fr
• 6’11”
/ 240 lbs
Projected Team
San Antonio
|
PROSPECT RNK
18th
|
POSITION RNK
8th
|
PPG
9.5
|
RPG
7.9
|
APG
0.7
|
3P%
33.3%
|
Cenac will not be selected in this draft in a way that correlates with where he was ranked coming out of high school — but he’s still a possible top-20 pick after starting for a Houston team that finished 30-7. Some have argued he should’ve done another year at Houston, and I get that. But there’s little risk of Cenac falling out of the first round, and a future in San Antonio alongside Victor Wembanyama sounds appealing.
|
Iowa
• Sr
• 6’4″
/ 190 lbs
Projected Team
Detroit
|
PROSPECT RNK
19th
|
POSITION RNK
7th
|
PPG
19.8
|
RPG
2.6
|
APG
4.4
|
3P%
35.8%
|
It’s rare for somebody to end up as a first-round pick after starting a college career at the Division II level, but Stirtz has a real chance to do it. Concerns about how he’ll defend in the NBA are valid. But Stirtz is a lead guard with a good assist-to-turnover ratio and reliable jumper. If I were running a franchise, I wouldn’t overthink this one. He can play and will be in the NBA for a long time.
|
Arizona
• Fr
• 6’8″
/ 235 lbs
Projected Team
Philadelphia
|
PROSPECT RNK
11th
|
POSITION RNK
4th
|
PPG
14.1
|
RPG
5.6
|
APG
2.6
|
3P%
35%
|
Peat impacts winning in a variety of ways and was among the reasons Arizona won the Big 12’s regular-season championship before advancing to the Final Four. Good size. Good body. Intriguing prospect. The issue is that he’s a 6-8 wing who doesn’t really shoot, evidence being that Peat only took 20 3-pointers in 36 games with the Wildcats. That’s not ideal for the modern-NBA and why Peat’s draft-range seems vast.
|
Connecticut
• Sr
• 6’11”
/ 265 lbs
Projected Team
Atlanta
|
PROSPECT RNK
32nd
|
POSITION RNK
7th
|
PPG
14.7
|
RPG
9
|
APG
2.3
|
3P%
0%
|
If Mara helped himself more than any other prospect in the NCAA Tournament, Reed isn’t far below him on the list. The UConn big averaged 19.5 points and 13.2 rebounds in the Big Dance while helping the Huskies reach the championship game. He could add depth to an Atlanta frontcourt that needs reinforcements.
|
Santa Clara
• Fr
• 6’9″
/ 225 lbs
Projected Team
New York
|
PROSPECT RNK
30th
|
POSITION RNK
9th
|
PPG
11.8
|
RPG
6.5
|
APG
1.8
|
3P%
41.3%
|
Seemingly every year now there’s an off-the-radar prospect who generates attention largely because of an interesting statistical profile. Graves is that player in this draft. The 6-9 forward was a zero-star prospect in the Class of 2025 but is now a 19 year-old with options. He could return to college at a new school for lots of money or remain in the draft, where his ability to make shots and rebound with a good body will secure him a guaranteed contract.
|
Duke
• Soph
• 6’6″
/ 180 lbs
Projected Team
L.A. Lakers
|
PROSPECT RNK
24th
|
POSITION RNK
3rd
|
PPG
15
|
RPG
3.2
|
APG
1.3
|
3P%
36.1%
|
Evans is a high-volume 3-point shooter with good positional size who shot 38% from beyond the arc in two seasons with one of the best brands and teams in college basketball. That’s a good place to start his evaluation. The 20-year-old wing could be a nice piece for a Lakers franchise still building around Luka Doncic.
|
Iowa State
• Sr
• 6’9″
/ 240 lbs
Projected Team
Denver
|
PROSPECT RNK
37th
|
POSITION RNK
11th
|
PPG
16.4
|
RPG
7.4
|
APG
4.8
|
3P%
34.5%
|
Jefferson spent four years in college and went from a role player at Saint Mary’s to a star at Iowa State, where he was an All-American this season while helping the Cyclones win 29 games. He’s a big forward who just gets things done. He projects as a versatile option that could fit well in Denver’s rotation in between Jamal Murray and Nikola Jokic.
|
North Carolina
• Jr
• 7’0″
/ 225 lbs
Projected Team
Boston
|
PROSPECT RNK
23rd
|
POSITION RNK
4th
|
PPG
17
|
RPG
8.7
|
APG
2.1
|
3P%
42.6%
|
Michael Malone’s first year at UNC would’ve been a lot simpler if he could’ve kept Veesaar in school, but the talented big decided to forgo his final year of eligibility in favor of a professional career. Did Veesaar leave money on the table with this move? Perhaps. But it’s a move that made the draft deeper after other first-round prospects like Braylon Mullins and Thomas Haugh decided to remain in college, and the Celtics could be the franchise that benefits from it.
|
Texas
• Jr
• 6’8″
/ 225 lbs
Projected Team
Minnesota
|
PROSPECT RNK
27th
|
POSITION RNK
3rd
|
PPG
17.3
|
RPG
7.5
|
APG
3.6
|
3P%
34.4%
|
Swain followed his coach, Sean Miller, from Xavier to Texas and emerged as the Longhorns’ leading scorer. The 20 year-old from Ohio is more of a driver than a shooter — and he probably needs to become a better shooter to justify a first-round grade. But there’s definitely stuff here for Minnesota to work with, starting with the fact that Swain is an explosive athlete who impacts things on both ends.
|
Baylor
• Fr
• 6’5″
/ 215 lbs
Projected Team
Cleveland
|
PROSPECT RNK
33rd
|
POSITION RNK
5th
|
PPG
17.8
|
RPG
5.9
|
APG
1.6
|
3P%
29.3%
|
Like several others, Yessoufou has options to return to college for a big number — and he might actually do that. But if the dynamic scorer remains in the draft, he’s an obvious option late in the first round. There are concerns about his 3-point percentage that finished below 32% in his one season at Baylor. But the level of production the 20 year-old former McDonald’s All-American has displayed since high school should not be ignored by evaluators.
|
Stanford
• Fr
• 6’2″
/ 185 lbs
Projected Team
Dallas
|
PROSPECT RNK
29th
|
POSITION RNK
9th
|
PPG
23.2
|
RPG
3.6
|
APG
3.6
|
3P%
35.4%
|
Kyrie Irving remains under contract in Dallas for at least another year — but that doesn’t mean the Mavericks shouldn’t explore lead-guard options. Okorie should be among them if he’s still available here. The 19 year-old led the ACC in scoring and tallied at least 33 points five different times this season, including a career-high 40 in a win over Georgia Tech.
|