Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind chief Arshad Madani Wednesday took a swipe at the Congress, arguing that the “soft and flexible” approach adopted by leaders towards religion-based politics of hatred after India’s Independence has inflicted long-term damage on the country and its Constitution. In a detailed post on X, Madani said the Congress failed to take a firm stand against communalism 77 years ago and accused the party of not decisively confronting it even after the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi.
He wrote that had communalism been dealt with firmly immediately after Gandhi’s killing, the country could have been spared much of the turmoil it faces today. Madani alleged that the Congress’s accommodative stance during its years in power weakened both the nation and constitutional values.
“After the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi, had the head of communalism been crushed firmly at that very moment, the country could have been saved from destruction. The flexible policy adopted by the Congress during its rule toward politics of hatred based on religion caused severe damage to both the country and the Constitution. Seventy-seven years after independence, the manner in which the Constitution and democratic values are being openly trampled upon is something that even our leaders of the freedom movement could not have imagined. If the Constitution had been implemented honestly and fully along the very lines on which the foundations of free India were laid, we would not be witnessing these days today,” Madani wrote.
Madani added that the Congress leaders perhaps acted out of fear and adopted a soft and flexible stance against religiously driven politics of hatred. He wrote, “It is an unfortunate truth that from the very beginning, Congress leaders, perhaps out of some fear adopted a soft and flexible stance against religiously driven politics of hatred. Communal forces were treated with leniency, and strict legal action against them, as required by the Constitution and law, was avoided. As a result, communal forces were given ample opportunity to grow and strengthen.”
Describing the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi as the killing of the country’s secularism, Madani traced back how the “father of the nation” went on a fast to stop the anti-Muslim riots post-Partition. He said, “Communal forces were behind the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. Had communalism been crushed at that very time, the country could have been saved from devastation. After Partition, when anti-Muslim riots erupted across the country, Mahatma Gandhi went on a fast to stop them. This did not sit well with communal forces, and even with some senior leaders within the Congress. They turned against him, and ultimately, he was assassinated. In our view, the killing of a great personality like Mahatma Gandhi was the killing of the country’s secularism itself. Sadly, what the Congress leadership should have done at that time, it failed to do.”
Madani also went on to argue how the Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind insisted on framing a secular Constitution, while a few Congress leaders had argued against its necessity after the formation of Pakistan.
He said, “The leadership of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind repeatedly demanded that the Congress leadership put an end to this madness of communalism, but regrettably, this demand was not taken seriously, which further emboldened communal elements. Today’s generation is unaware of this history that even before independence, the senior leaders of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind had obtained a written assurance from Congress leaders that after independence the country’s Constitution would be secular and would guarantee complete religious freedom to all religious minorities. However, after independence and the Partition of the country, a significant section of Congress leaders joined those who argued that since a separate country had been created for Muslims in the name of religion, India’s Constitution should no longer be secular.
Story continues below this ad
At that moment, the leadership of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind firmly held the Congress leaders accountable and told them that if the country had been divided, it was they, not us, who had signed that document, and therefore they must fulfill their promise. Consequently, a secular Constitution was framed, but the roots of communalism continued to grow silently and deeply. Despite persistent insistence by Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, no effective restraint was placed on it, even though the Congress was in power at the Centre and in all the provinces at that time. Had it wished, it could have enacted strict laws against communalism. But due to the flexible policy it adopted, communal forces kept becoming stronger.”
He added, “If the Congress had taken the same strict stand against communalism 77 years ago that it claims to be taking now, it would not have been ousted from power, and the country would not have reached the brink of destruction.”
